Patterson v. Orlando-Orange County et al
| Dimitri Patterson |
| Orlando-Orange County, Miami-Dade County, Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Cornita Riley, Jeanette Bigney, Alfredo Zamora and Oscar Rodriguez-Fonts |
| 6:2018cv00950 |
| June 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Carlos E. Mendoza |
| Gregory J. Kelly |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER granting in part 108 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Counts I, III, IV, V, VII, VIII, and IX of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) are DISMISSED with prejudice. Counts II and VI of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) are DISMI SSED without prejudice. On or before June 18, 2019, Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint addressing only Counts II and VI against Defendant Orange County. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 132 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/30/2019. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER granting Defendant Cornita Riley's 94 motion to dismiss; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 131 Report and Recommendations. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Cornita Riley. The Clerk is directed to terminate Cornita Riley as a defendant in this matter and amend the case style accordingly. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/17/2019. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER granting Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.'s 95 motion to dismiss; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 126 Report and Recommendations. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. The Clerk is directed to terminate Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. as a defendant in this matter and amend the case style accordingly. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/13/2019. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 91 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; The Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Miami-Dade County. The Clerk is directed to terminate Miami-Dade County as a defendant in this matter and amend the case style accordingly. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 121 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/23/2019. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER granting 92 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 119 Report and Recommendations. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Alfredo Zamora. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/9/2019. (DJD)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting 35 motion to dismiss; Granting 37 motion to dismiss; Granting 46 motion to dismiss; Granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting 60 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting [22 ] motion to dismiss; Granting 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Granting 29 Motion for More Definite Statement. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 73 Report and Recommendations. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to DefendantsRodriguez-Fonts and Bigney. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as to the remaining Defendants. On or before December 17, 2018, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint.. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/29/2018. (DJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
