Guinta v. Commissioner of Social Security
Kimberly Dawn Guinta |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
6:2018cv01064 |
July 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Volusia |
Daniel C Irick |
G Kendall Sharp |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's counsel shall obtain the required forms on the Court's website, and return the completed summons(es) and Marshal 285 form(s) to the Clerk on or before July 20, 2018. The Clerk is directed to provide the completed summons (es) and Marshal 285 form(s) to the United States Marshal. Upon receipt of the completed summons(es) and Marshal 285 form(s), the United States Marshal is directed to serve the summonses without cost to Plaintiff.Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 7/5/2018. (RN) |
Filing 3 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (RDO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kimberly Dawn Guinta. (RDO) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Kimberly Dawn Guinta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RDO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.