Morales v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
Taysha Rosario Morales |
JetBlue Airways Corporation |
6:2018cv01218 |
July 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Orlando Office |
Osceola |
Gregory J Kelly |
G Kendall Sharp |
Airplane |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #2 without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend #14 is granted in that Plaintiffs are permitted to file an amended complaint within (21) twenty-one days from the date of this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint within the specified time period may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 9/24/2018. (SC) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 AMENDED RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Leave to Amend the Complaint and incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Levenson, Joshua) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Levenson, Joshua) |
Filing 16 ORDER to strike re: #15 Notice of Unavailability filed by Taysha Rosario Morales. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 9/11/2018. (MB) |
Filing 15 (STRICKEN BY #16 ORDER) NOTICE of unavailability of counsel by Taysha Rosario Morales from 4/8/19 to 4/19/19. (Balinsky, Laurette) Modified on 9/12/2018 (RDO). |
Filing 14 AMENDED RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION for Leave to Amend the Complaint and incorporated Memorandum of Law by Taysha Rosario Morales. (Balinsky, Laurette) Modified on 9/4/2018 (RDO). |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint and MOTION for Leave to Amend the Complaint and incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Taysha Rosario Morales. (Balinsky, Laurette) Modified on 9/4/2018 (RDO). |
Filing 12 AMENDED Notice of pendency of related cases re #3 Related Case Order. Related cases: yes. (Levenson, Joshua) Modified on 8/29/2018 (RDO). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Levenson, Joshua) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by JetBlue Airways Corporation. Related case(s): yes (Levenson, Joshua) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Levenson, Joshua) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Taysha Rosario Morales. (Balinsky, Laurette) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Taysha Rosario Morales. Related case(s): yes (Balinsky, Laurette) |
Set/reset deadlines/hearings: for JetBlue Airways Corporation. Answer due by 8/17/2018. (RDO) |
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Defendant's, JetBlue Airways Corporation, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. JetBlue Airways Corporation's answer or response due on or before 8/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 8/2/2018. (MB) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 8/17/18 to File Answer re #2 Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nauman, Robin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. Modified on 8/1/2018 (RDO). |
Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER for both Plaintiff and Defendant.. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 7/31/2018. (counsel emailed)(AKC) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 7/31/2018. (copies mailed/emailed)(AKC) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JetBlue Airways Corporation with Jury Demand filed in Osceola County Court on 06/27/2018 filed by Taysha Rosario Morales.(ALL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Osceola County Court, case number 2018 CA 2039 ON filed in State Court on 06/27/2018. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ORL075572 filed by JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Documents filed in State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ALL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morales v. JetBlue Airways Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Taysha Rosario Morales | |
Represented By: | Laurette Anne Balinsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JetBlue Airways Corporation | |
Represented By: | Robin Michelle Nauman |
Represented By: | Joshua Royas Levenson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.