Pollock v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Barbara Lynice Pollock
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 6:2018cv01296
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: G Kendall Sharp
Referring Judge: Thomas B Smith
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2018 Filing 12 PROOF of service on 9/20/18 as to the Office of Regional Counsel, SSA by Barbara Lynice Pollock (RDO)
September 25, 2018 Filing 11 PROOF of service on 9/24/18 as to the Office of the US Attorney General by Barbara Lynice Pollock (RDO)
September 13, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Barbara Lynice Pollock. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/13/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (RDO)
September 6, 2018 Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RDO)
August 30, 2018 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice by Barbara Lynice Pollock. (Fugate, Shea)
August 30, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Barbara Lynice Pollock. Related case(s): no (Fugate, Shea)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 8/10/2018. (Smith, Thomas)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 8/10/2018. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (RDO)
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of indigency by Barbara Lynice Pollock. (RDO)
August 8, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barbara Lynice Pollock. (RDO) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith.
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Barbara Lynice Pollock. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RDO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pollock v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Lynice Pollock
Represented By: Shea A. Fugate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?