Dixon v. Hansell et al
| Titus Dixon |
| Russell Gibson and Robert E. Hansell |
| 6:2018cv01376 |
| August 20, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Titus Dixon. (Tobin, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Titus Dixon. Related case(s): No (Tobin, Bradley) |
Filing 4
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/10/2018. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 8/27/2018. Copies mailed. (LAM)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/10/2018. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 8/27/2018. Copies mailed. (LAM)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Russell Gibson, Robert E. Hansell. (Original was mailed back to counsel for service.) (JP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ORL76182) filed by Titus Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
