United States of America v. Scherer
Appellee: Ronald E. Scherer, Sr.
Appellant: United States of America
Case Number: 6:2018cv01381
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy B Dalton
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Filing 4 APPELLANT'S BRIEF by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Unpublished decision)(Tennyson, Steven)
October 15, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1 (ctp) (JLC)
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 BANKRUPTCY RECORD on appeal consisting of items as designated on transmittal filed by United States of America. Related document: #1 Bankruptcy notice of appeal filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 docket sheet, #2 Case Management Summary, #3 Schedules A - J and Summary of Assets, Declaration of Debtor, Statement of Financial Affairs, Chapter 11 Statement of Current Monthly Income, #4 Motion to Determine Secured Status, #5 Motion to Determine Secured Status.2, #6 Motion to Determine Secured Status.3, #7 Motion to Compel Abandonment., #8 Motion to Compel Abandonment.2, #9 Motion to Compel Abandonment.3, #10 Response to Motion to Determine Secured Status, #11 Response to Motion to Determine Secured Status.2, #12 Response to Motion to Determine Secured Status.3, #13 Order Denying Motion To Compel Abandonment, #14 Order Denying Motion To Compel Abandonment.2, #15 Order Denying Motion To Compel Abandonment.3, #16 Corrective Motion to Compel Abandonment, #17 Corrective Motion to Compel Abandonment.2, #18 Corrective Motion to Compel Abandonment.3, #19 Response to Motion for Order Compelling Abandonment of Debtor's Stock Interest in Intelligent Perimeter Systems, Inc, #20 Response to Motion for Order Compelling Abandonment of Debtor's Stock in Maples Health Care, Inc., #21 Response to Motion for Order Compelling Abandonment of Debtor's Interest in Three Promissory Notes, #22 Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration of Order Approving Application to Employ, #23 Order Scheduling Trial and Requiring All Pleadings by Negative Notice, #24 Notice of Appeal, #25 Statement of Issues on Appeal, and Amended Designation of the Record, #26 Supplement to Designation of Record by Debtor as Appellee of Appeal of Interlocutory Order)(FC)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 BANKRUPTCY notice of interlocutory appeal by United States of America. Bankruptcy Court case number 6:17-bk-2004-KSJ. Filed in Bankruptcy Court on 8/17/18. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal)(LMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Scherer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Ronald E. Scherer, Sr.
Represented By: James H. Monroe, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: United States of America
Represented By: Steven S. Tennyson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?