Currier v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| Rudolph Currier |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 6:2018cv01384 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Karla R Spaulding |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CASE REFERRED to Mediation. Gary Salzman appointed as Mediator. (SPM) |
Filing 17
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2018, Joinder of Parties due by 11/16/2018, Discovery due by 7/26/2019, Dispositive motions due by 8/30/2019, Pretrial statement due by 1/13/2020, All other motions due by 11/29/2019, Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 5/24/2019, Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 6/21/2019, Trial Status Conference set for 1/16/2020 at 10:00 AM in Orlando Courtroom 5 B before Judge Carlos E. Mendoza, Jury Trial set for the trial term commencing 2/3/2020 before Judge Carlos E. Mendoza, Conduct mediation hearing by 8/16/2019. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/15/2018. (DJD)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss #9 Amended Complaint by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Keller, Courtney) Modified on 10/10/2018 (SPM). |
| Set/reset deadlines: Answer to Amended Complaint due by 10/10/2018. (ALL) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to File a Response to the Amended Complaint. Answer or response due 10/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 9/21/2018. (ECJ)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to October 10, 2018, to File Answer re #9 Amended Complaint by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Keller, Courtney) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding. Modified on 9/20/2018 (SPM). |
| Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Keller, Courtney) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Rudolph Currier identifying Corporate Parent Rudolph Currier for Rudolph Currier.. (Kim, Young) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Rudolph Currier. Related case(s): yes (Kim, Young) Modified on 9/17/2018 (SPM). |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. - Parent of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a publicly traded company (symbol: JPM), Other Affiliate JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A... (Keller, Courtney) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. with Jury Demand. filed by Rudolph Currier. Related document: #2 Complaint filed by Rudolph Currier.(Kim, Young) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Related case(s): yes (Keller, Courtney) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Keller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 6
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/31/2018. (DJD) ctp
|
| Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/14/2018. Signed by D. Darley/Deputy Clerk on 8/31/2018. (DJD) ctp |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. The defendant shall file an answer or respond on or before September 4, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on 8/23/2018. (RDO)
|
| Set deadline: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Answer due by 9/4/2018. (SPM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #2 by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Keller, Courtney) FILED IN STATE COURT 8/13/2018. Modified on 8/22/2018 (SPM). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. with Jury Demand filed by Rudolph Currier. Filed in Seminole County Court on 7/13/2018.(SPM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Seminole County, case number 2018-CA-001860-16-L filed in State Court on 7/13/2018. Filing fee $400, receipt number ORL076252 filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Composite Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Currier v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rudolph Currier | |
| Represented By: | Young Vincent Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Tyrone Andre Adras |
| Represented By: | Colin Baker |
| Represented By: | Courtney M. Keller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
