Garrett v. Sholl et al
Tracy Garrett |
Jason Sams, Michael Nielson, Judge Barkett, Peter J. Sholl, Judge Edmondson and Judge Martin |
6:2018cv01425 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Gregory J Kelly |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #7 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Tracy Garrett. Related case(s): no (JET) |
|
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Colorado; Case Number 1:18-cv-02162. File received electronically |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT re: #4 ORDER to Transfer Complaint by Clerk on 8/28/2018. (angar, ) [Transferred from cod on 8/30/2018.] |
|
Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tracy Garrett; Inmate financial statement attached. (dbera, ) [Transferred from cod on 8/30/2018.] Modified on 8/30/2018 (JET). |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) [Transferred from cod on 8/30/2018.] |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Judge Barkett, Judge Edmondson, Judge Martin, Michael Nielson, Jason Sams, Peter J. Sholl, filed by Tracy Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dbera, ) [Transferred from cod on 8/30/2018.] Modified on 8/30/2018 (JET). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.