Kim v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Young S. Kim
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Case Number: 6:2018cv01468
Filed: September 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Paul G Byron
Referring Judge: Thomas B Smith
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Filing 18 CASE REFERRED to Mediation. (ALL)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 10/26/2018. (KWH)
October 26, 2018 Set scheduling order deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/14/2018, Joinder of Parties due by 12/14/2018, Discovery due by 5/17/2019, Dispositive motions due by 6/14/2019, Pretrial statement due by 7/26/2019, All other motions due by 8/9/2019, Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/12/2019 at 10:00 AM, Jury Trial set for 12/9/2019 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith, Conduct mediation hearing by 6/7/2019. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 4/12/2019, Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 3/15/2019. (ALL)
October 22, 2018 Filing 16 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. New case number: 6:18-cv-1468-Orl-TBS. Judge Paul G. Byron no longer assigned to the case. (GJS)
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re #13 Amended Case Management Report. This case is REFERRED to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, with any appeal to be taken to the United States Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/19/2018. (MMW)
October 18, 2018 Filing 15 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Young S. Kim and Scottsdale Insurance Company. (see #13 Amended Case Management Report. (RDO)
October 18, 2018 Filing 13 Amended CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Glasgow, Gina) Modified on 10/19/2018 (BIA).
October 12, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Yemil Aragon on behalf of Young S. Kim (Aragon, Yemil)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER to strike re: #10 Case Management Report. The parties are DIRECTED to amend their case management report under I. Meeting of Parties in Person, to include the following language: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B) or (c)(3)(A), a meeting was held in person on _________________ (date) at _________________ (time) at _________________(place) and was attended by:________________________. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/9/2018. (MMW)
October 5, 2018 Filing 10 (STRICKEN BY #11 ENDORSED ORDER) CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Glasgow, Gina) Modified on 10/10/2018 (RDO).
September 28, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #4 Related Case Order by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Related case(s): No (Glasgow, Gina) Modified on 10/1/2018 (RDO).
September 28, 2018 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Glasgow, Gina)
September 25, 2018 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO #3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Glasgow, Gina) Modified on 9/26/2018 (RDO).
September 14, 2018 Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Scottsdale Insurance Company.(Glasgow, Gina)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. The Certificate of Interested Persons shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/14/2018. (GNB) copies e-mailed
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/14/2018. (GNB) copies e-mailed
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to Show Cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 9/11/2018. (Smith, Thomas)
September 7, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Scottsdale Insurance Company with Jury Demand filed by Young S. Kim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (originally filed in Seminole County Circuit Court on 8/2/18)(RDO)
September 7, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Seminole County Circuit Court, case number 2018-CA-002060-15-W, filed in State Court on 8/2/18. Filing fee $ 400 - receipt number ORL076694. Filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court papers, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RDO) Text modified on 9/10/2018 (RDO).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Represented By: Andrew Peter Rock
Represented By: Gina Sciortino Glasgow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Young S. Kim
Represented By: Tracey A. Foglia
Represented By: Yemil Aragon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?