Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Hub City Enterprises, Inc. et al
Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
Wall St. Enterprises of Orlando, Inc., Hub City Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Hunt |
6:2018cv01608 |
September 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Gregory J Kelly |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #14 Interested persons order by Hub City Enterprises, Inc., Wall St. Enterprises of Orlando, Inc.. (Main, Steven) |
Filing 14 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by defendants by 10/31/2018. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/17/2018. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 13 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Hub City Enterprises, Inc., Wall St. Enterprises of Orlando, Inc..(Main, Steven) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 AMENDED MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AND WRITTEN DESIGNATION AND CONSENT TO ACT, provided counsel shall register for and use the electronic filing system as adopted by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 10/10/2018. (MB) |
Filing 11 Amended MOTION for Jordon S. Steinway to appear pro hac vice by Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Mohre, Frederick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
Filing 10 ORDER denying #7 MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AND WRITTEN DESIGNATION AND CONSENT TO ACT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 10/9/2018. (MB) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to Robert Hunt (issued at intake). (SPM) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Related case(s): Yes (Mohre, Frederick) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Jordan S. Steinway to appear pro hac vice by Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Mohre, Frederick) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Mohre, Frederick) |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Jordon Steinway, appearing on behalf of Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company (Filing fee $150 receipt number ORL077464.) Related document: #7 MOTION for Jordan S. Steinway to appear pro hac vice. (RCN) |
Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 10/12/2018. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/28/2018. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/12/2018. Signed by D. Darley/Deputy Clerk on 9/28/2018. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel of Local Rule 2.02 for Jordon S. Steinway. A copy was mailed to counsel. (signed by deputy clerk). (JP) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Hub City Enterprises, Inc., Wall St. Enterprises of Orlando, Inc. (Issued at intake.) (JP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ORL077209) filed by Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(JP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.