Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al v. Next Gen Technology, LLC et al
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. |
Next Gen Technology, LLC, Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo and Does 1-20 |
6:2018cv01848 |
October 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Gregory A Presnell |
Thomas B Smith |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Dellinger, Richard) |
Filing 29 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #28 Amended Complaint by Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC.(Nardella, Michael) |
Filing 28 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages and Injunctive Relief against Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC with Jury Demand. filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP.(Dellinger, Richard) Modified on 11/29/2018 (SPM). |
Filing 27 Case Reassigned to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza. New case number: 6:18-cv-1848-Orl-41TBS. Judge Gregory A. Presnell no longer assigned to the case. (MAA) |
Filing 26 ORDER that the Clerk will transfer this case to the Honorable Carlos E. Mendoza, with his permission. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 11/27/2018. (TKW) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Defendants Next Gen Technology, LLC, Mohamed Datoo, and Sakina Datoo's responses to the complaint are due by 12/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 11/20/2018. (Smith, Thomas) |
Set deadlines for Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC. Answer due by 12/13/2018. (BIA) |
Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC. (Nardella, Michael) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. |
Filing 23 ORDER granting #22 motion for Louis P. Feuchtbaum to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 11/15/2018. (Smith, Thomas) |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Michael H. Hewitt, appearing on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Filing fee $150 receipt number ORL078521.) Related document: #20 MOTION for Michael H. Hewitt to appear pro hac vice. (RCN) |
ENTERED IN ERROR. |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Louis P. Feuchtbaum, appearing on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Filing fee $150 receipt number ORL07521.) Related document: #22 Amended MOTION for Louis P. Feuchtbaum to appear pro hac vice. (RCN) |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Richard J. Nelson, appearing on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Filing fee $150 receipt number ORL078521.) Related document: #18 MOTION for Richard J. Nelson to appear pro hac vice. (RCN) |
Filing 22 Amended MOTION for Louis P. Feuchtbaum to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Dellinger, Richard) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. |
Filing 21 ORDER granting #18 motion for Richard J. Nelson to appear pro hac vice; denying without prejudice #19 motion for Louis P. Feuchtbaum to appear pro hac vice; granting #20 motion for Michael H. Hewitt to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 11/14/2018. (Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 20 MOTION for Michael H. Hewitt to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Dellinger, Richard) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. |
Filing 19 MOTION for Louis P. Feuchtbaum to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Dellinger, Richard) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. |
Filing 18 MOTION for Richard J. Nelson to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Dellinger, Richard) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #9 Interested persons order by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.. (Dellinger, Richard) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #8 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.. Related case(s): Yes (Dellinger, Richard) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #8 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC. Related case(s): No (Nardella, Michael) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #9 Interested persons order by Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC. (Nardella, Michael) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Nardella on behalf of Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Next Gen Technology, LLC (Nardella, Michael) |
Filing 12 RETURN of service executed on 11/1/18 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. as to Sakina Datoo. (Dellinger, Richard) Modified on 11/8/2018 (BIA). |
Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 11/1/18 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. as to Mohamed Datoo. (Dellinger, Richard) Modified on 11/8/2018 (BIA). |
Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 11/1/18 by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development, LP, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. as to Next Gen Technology, LLC. (Dellinger, Richard) Modified on 11/8/2018 (BIA). |
Filing 9 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 11/14/2018. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/31/2018. Copies mailed.(LAM) |
Filing 8 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 11/14/2018. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/31/2018. Copies mailed. (LAM) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to Sakina Datoo. (BIA) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Mohamed Datoo. (BIA) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Next Gen Technology, LLC. (BIA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Richard J. Nelson, Louis P. Feuchtbaum, and Michael H. Hewitt of Local Rule 2.02 (signed by deputy clerk). (Copies mailed) (BIA) |
Filing 3 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (BIA) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. New case number: 6:18-cv-1848-Orl-31TBS. (NAS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Injunctive Relief against Next Gen Technology, LLC, Mohamed Datoo, Sakina Datoo, Does 1-20 with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14769375) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons to be Issued (Next Gen Technology LLC), #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons to be Issued (Mohamed Datoo), #4 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons to be Issued (Sakina Datoo))(Dellinger, Richard) Modified on 10/31/2018 (BIA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.