Llinas v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
| Cynthia Llinas |
| Merck & Co, Inc., McKesson Corporation and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp. |
| 6:2018cv01877 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Karla R Spaulding |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Case transferred from Florida Middle has been opened in Eastern District of Pennsylvania as case 2:18-cv-20155, filed 11/21/2018. (MAA) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #9 Interested persons order by Cynthia Llinas. (DeGisi, Carmen) |
| Filing 11 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Eastern District of Pennsylvania. MDL case number: 2848 (MAA) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #8 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Cynthia Llinas. Related case(s): yes (DeGisi, Carmen) |
| Filing 9 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/14/2018. (ctp)(JLC) |
| Filing 8 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/14/2018. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement, #3 Supplement)(ctp)(JLC) |
| Filing 7 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by Cynthia Llinas.(DeGisi, Carmen) Modified on 11/14/2018 (LMM). |
| Filing 6 POSSIBLE MDL Tag Along cases for MDL Case Number 2848, In re: Re: MDL No. 2848 IN RE: Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Products Liability Litigation. Information emailed to MDL Panel on 11/6/2018. (Attachments: #1 List of Merck Cases filed 11/2/18) (MAA) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to McKesson Corporation, Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp. (LMM) |
| Filing 4 PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 8 (filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on 10/3/18 in MDL-2848): No action shall be filed with more than one plaintiff. All complaints heretofore filed which name more than one plaintiff are severed. The first named plaintiff shall file an amended complaint with the civil action number of the original complaint. The remaining plaintiffs shall file within 30 days separate individual complaints with new civil action numbers. The new complaints of the severed plaintiffs shall be deemed to have been filed on and related back to the date the original complaint was filed. The filing fee already paid shall apply to the action of the first named plaintiff, and in each of the new actions the required filing fee shall be paid. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/3/2018. (MAA) |
| Set/reset deadlines/hearings: Amended Complaint due by 11/16/2018 (LMM) |
Filing 3
ORDER: The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/2/2018. (ctp)(JLC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding. New case number: 6:18-cv-1877-Orl-37KRS. (NAS) |
| Filing 1 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14783085) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Merck Summons, #2 Proposed Summons MSD Summons, #3 Proposed Summons McKesson Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet CCS Llinas)(DeGisi, Carmen) Modified on 11/5/2018 (LMM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
