Ramirez v. Commissioner Social Security
Sarah E. Ramirez |
Commissioner Social Security |
SSA |
6:2018cv02213 |
December 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Karla R Spaulding |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Sarah E. Ramirez. Related case(s): No (Culbertson, Richard) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (DMA) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 12/28/2018. (GNB) copies e-mailed |
Filing 3 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 07/23/2010. (DMA) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding. New case number: 6:18-cv-2213-Orl-40KRS. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14960636) filed by Sarah E. Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Culbertson, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.