In RE: Anesh Gupta
| Anesh Gupta |
| 6:2018mc00070 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER denying #1 Motion to proceed anonymously in 42 U.S.C. 1983 Proceeding. This miscellaneous proceeding involving no further requested relief, the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 12/21/2018. (SPM)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to proceed annonymously in 42 U.S.C. 1983 proceeding (Filing fee $47.00 receipt number ORL079192) by Anesh Gupta. (SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In RE: Anesh Gupta | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anesh Gupta | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
