Roor International BV et al v. 419 Smoke Shop, Inc. et al
| Sream, Inc. and Roor International BV |
| 419 Smoke Shop, Inc. and Robert E Licata |
| 6:2019cv00302 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by 419 Smoke Shop, Inc., Robert E Licata. (Minerley, Kenneth) |
| Filing 15 DEMAND for trial by jury by 419 Smoke Shop, Inc., Robert E Licata. (Minerley, Kenneth) |
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER to strike re: #13 Case Management Report. The parties are DIRECTED to utilize Judge Byron's case management report form located at the Court's website www.flmd.uscourts.gov under 'About the Judges,' select Judge Paul Byron, and click on the 'Forms' tab. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/26/2019. (MMW)
|
| Filing 13 Stricken per 14 -CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Sasson, Jamie) Modified on 3/26/2019 (AC). |
|
Filing 12
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Defendants 419 Smoke Shop, Inc. and Robert E Licata shall file a Certificate of Interested Persons within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/20/2019. (GNB) copies e-mailed
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED ANSWER to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint by 419 Smoke Shop, Inc., Robert E Licata. (Minerley, Kenneth) |
| Filing 10 Defendants' ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by 419 Smoke Shop, Inc., Robert E Licata.(Minerley, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 2/26/19 by Roor International BV, Sream, Inc. as to 419 Smoke Shop, Inc.. (Sasson, Jamie) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Roor International BV, Sream, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Jarir Farraj, Other Affiliate Martin Birzle for Roor International BV, Sream, Inc... (Sasson, Jamie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Roor International BV, Sream, Inc.. Related case(s): No (Sasson, Jamie) |
|
Filing 6
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. The Certificate of Interested Persons shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/21/2019. (GNB) copies e-mailed
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/21/2019. (GNB) copies e-mailed
|
| Filing 4 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (RDO) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to 419 Smoke Shop, Inc. and Robert E Licata. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(RDO) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:19-cv-302-Orl-40DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15133477) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons)(Sasson, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
