Peters v. Commissioner Social Security
| John George Peters |
| Commissioner Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2019cv00304 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Thomas B Smith |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. New case number: 6:19-cv-304-Orl-TBS. Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp no longer assigned to the case. (MAA) |
| Set/reset deadlines/hearings: Joint memorandum due by 9/10/2019 (RDO) |
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 4/10/2019. (KWH)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER approving consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 4/9/2019. (SC) Modified on 4/10/2019 (SC).
|
| Filing 14 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #12 Answer to Complaint by Commissioner Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Appendix, #8 Appendix, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix, #11 Appendix, #12 Appendix, #13 Appendix, #14 Appendix, #15 Appendix, #16 Appendix, #17 Appendix, #18 Appendix, #19 Appendix, #20 Appendix)(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Commissioner Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner Social Security.(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 11 PROOF of service on 2/28/19 as to the Office of the US Attorney General filed by John George Peters (RDO) |
| Filing 10 PROOF of service on 2/26/19 as to the Office of Regional Counsel, SSA filed by John George Peters (RDO) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by John George Peters. Commissioner Social Security served on 2/22/2019, answer due 4/23/2019. (RDO) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RDO) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by John George Peters. Related case(s): yes (Culbertson, Richard) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (RDO)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 2/15/2019. (Smith, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 2/15/2019. (copy emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. New case number: 6:19-cv-304-Orl-18TBS. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by John George Peters. (Culbertson, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security filed by John George Peters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Appendix)(Culbertson, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
