Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Norman Ed Miller |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2019cv00581 |
| March 25, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Patricia D Barksdale |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Thomas B Smith |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: The plaintiff must file a brief in support of the complaint by 8/9/2019. The defendant must file a responsive brief within 60 days of the CM/ECF filing date of the plaintiff's brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale on 6/14/2019. (ASL)
|
| Filing 16 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 6:19-cv-581-Orl-PDB. Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp no longer assigned to the case. (MAA) |
Filing 15
ORDER approving consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/3/2019. (SC)
|
| Filing 14 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #12 Answer to amended complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Appendix, #8 Appendix, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix, #11 Appendix, #12 Appendix, #13 Appendix, #14 Appendix, #15 Appendix, #16 Appendix, #17 Appendix, #18 Appendix, #19 Appendix, #20 Appendix)(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 4/3/19 by Norman Ed Miller as to US Attorney General . (Boyd, Bradley) Modified on 4/17/2019 (MAA). |
| Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 4/3/19 by Norman Ed Miller as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Boyd, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Norman Ed Miller. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/2/2019, answer due 6/3/2019. (Boyd, Bradley) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Norman Ed Miller. Related case(s): no (Boyd, Bradley) |
| Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 6:19-cv-581-Orl-18PDB. Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith no longer assigned to the case. (NAS) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Norman Ed Miller.(Boyd, Bradley) |
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 3/26/2019. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (DMA) |
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (DMA)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. New case number: 6:19-cv-581-Orl-18TBS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15277098) filed by Norman Ed Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons US Attorney, #3 Proposed Summons Office of General Counsel, #4 Proposed Summons Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.