Seymore v. Sullivan et al
Phillip M. Seymore |
Michael Sullivan, Stasia Warren, Florida Department of Revenue Title IV-D, Neal Coffin, Charles Ruppel and Karen Foxman |
6:2019cv00650 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Gregory J Kelly |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER adopting #10 Report and Recommendations; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/1/2019. (SCM) |
Filing 11 OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendations by Phillip M. Seymore. (RDO) |
Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court: 1. DENY the Motion (Doc. No. 2); 2. DISMISS the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 9) with prejudice; and 3. Direct the Clerk to CLOSE the case. A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. Failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 5/16/2019. (MB) |
Filing 9 AMENDED AMENDED COMPLAINT against Neal Coffin, Florida Department of Revenue Title IV-D, Charles Ruppel, Michael Sullivan with Jury Demand. Terminating Karen Foxman (Judge, official capacity) and Stasia Warren (Judge, official capacity) filed by Phillip M. Seymore. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip M. Seymore.(RDO) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Phillip M. Seymore. Related case(s): yes (RDO) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Phillip M. Seymore. (RDO) |
Filing 6 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. The Certificate of Interested Persons shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 4/16/2019. (GNB) copies mailed |
Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 4/16/2019. (GNB) copies mailed |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Phillip M. Seymore. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip M. Seymore.(RDO) |
Filing 3 ORDER to strike re: #1 Complaint filed by Phillip M. Seymore. On or before April 29, 2019, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a); and failure to file the amended complaint may result in the case being dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 4/9/2019. (MB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Phillip M. Seymore. (AC) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. |
Filing 1 (STRICKEN BY #3 ORDER) COMPLAINT against Neal Coffin, Florida Department of Revenue Title IV-D, Karen Foxman, Charles Ruppel, Michael Sullivan, Stasia Warren filed by Phillip M. Seymore.(AC) Modified on 4/10/2019 (RDO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.