Leblanc v. The State of Michigan et al
| Jeffrey Roland Leblanc |
| Kalamazoo County, Kalamazoo City, Social Security Administration and The State of Michigan |
| 6:2019cv00821 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Thomas B Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/3/2019. (GNB) copies mailed
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING COMPLIANCE. The plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a written response within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for failure to pay the filing fee in full or file the appropriate paperwork to seek leave of Court to proceed without paying the filing fee. Failure to respond may result in a dismissal of this action without further notice from the Court. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/13/2019. (GNB) copies mailed
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kalamazoo City, Kalamazoo County, Social Security Administration, The State of Michigan, with Jury Demand filed by Jeffrey Roland Leblanc.(No fee payment and no IFP submitted along with Complaint)(AC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
