Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
| Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee and Krystof Zawadzki |
| Six Unknown Names Agents, Donald Trump, Eric Garceti and DPT HUD |
| 6:2019cv00903 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Thomas B Smith |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT that the Plaintiffs, Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee,and Krystof Zawadzki, take nothing on their claims against the Defendants, Six Unknown Names Agents, Donald Trump, DPT HUD, and Eric Garceti, and the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (AC) |
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 5/29/2019. (SC)
|
|
Filing 2
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 5/16/2019. (copy mailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DPT HUD, Eric Garceti, Six Unknown Names Agents, Donald Trump filed by Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, and Krystof Zawadzki.(AC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
