Friedrich v City of Melbourne et al
Plaintiff: Larry Friedrich and Larry Friedrich a natural person doing business as Doc Holiday
Defendant: City of Melbourne, David Gillespie, Emil Castrillo and Phil Archer
Case Number: 6:2019cv00968
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Paul G Byron
Referring Judge: Thomas B Smith
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2019 Filing 22 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by City of Melbourne, David Gillespie. (Rego Chapman, Patricia)
July 9, 2019 Filing 21 RESPONSE TO #15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Larry Friedrich. (Minardi, Michael) Modified on 7/10/2019 (RDO).
July 3, 2019 Filing 20 SUMMONS issued as to Phil Archer, Emil Castrillo. (DMA)
July 3, 2019 Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Larry Friedrich. (Minardi, Michael) Modified on 7/3/2019 (DMA).
July 2, 2019 Filing 17 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Larry Friedrich. (Attachments: #1 Main Document Second Summons)(Minardi, Michael)
July 2, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #3 Related Case Order by Larry Friedrich. Related case(s): no (Minardi, Michael) Modified on 7/3/2019 (DMA).
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Plaintiff Larry Friedrich. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Orders #3 and #4. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE and file his response to said Orders within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal without prejudice or other appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 7/2/2019. (GNB) copies e-mailed
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 7/1/2019. (Smith, Thomas)
June 28, 2019 Filing 18 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Phil Archer, Emil Castrillo, City of Melbourne, David Gillespie with Jury Demand. filed by Larry Friedrich.(DMA)
June 28, 2019 Filing 13 SECOND AMENDED Complaint by Larry Friedrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Minardi, Michael) Modified on 7/1/2019 (RDO). (**DOCUMENT RE-FILED TO REFLECT CORRECT EVENT CODE AT DOC #18. PARTIES ADDED**) Modified on 7/3/2019 (DMA).
June 27, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint by Larry Friedrich. (Minardi, Michael)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Dismiss as unopposed. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. On or before Friday, June 28, 2019, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint. Failure to timely file will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/14/2019. (SCM)
June 14, 2019 Set deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 6/28/2019. (MAA)
June 4, 2019 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by City of Melbourne, David Gillespie. (Rego Chapman, Patricia)
June 4, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #3 Related Case Order by City of Melbourne, David Gillespie. Related case(s): No (Rego Chapman, Patricia) Modified on 6/5/2019 (RDO).
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss. The motion is rendered moot by the filing of the #7 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/31/2019. (SCM)
May 30, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by City of Melbourne, David Gillespie. (Rego Chapman, Patricia)
May 24, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of filing Civil Cover Sheet by City of Melbourne, David Gillespie re #1 Notice of Removal (Rego Chapman, Patricia) Modified on 5/24/2019 (SPM).
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. The Certificate of Interested Persons shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/24/2019. (GNB) copies e-mailed
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/24/2019. (GNB) copies e-mailed
May 23, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Melbourne. FILED IN STATE COURT 3/20/2019. (SPM)
May 23, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith. New case number: 6:19-cv-968-Orl-40TBS. (SJB)
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Civil, case number 2019-CA-016069 filed in State Court on February 22, 2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15498989 filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A to Petition for Removal, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 State Court Other Documents, #7 State Court Other Documents, #8 Amended COMPLAINT/State Court Other Documents, #9 State Court Other Documents, #10 State Court Other Documents, #11 State Court Other Documents, #12 Exhibit B to Petition for Removal, #13 Exhibit C to Petition for Removal)(Rego Chapman, Patricia) Modified on 5/24/2019 (SPM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friedrich v City of Melbourne et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Melbourne
Represented By: Patricia Maria Rego Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Gillespie
Represented By: Patricia Maria Rego Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emil Castrillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phil Archer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Friedrich
Represented By: Michael C. Minardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Friedrich a natural person doing business as Doc Holiday
Represented By: Michael C. Minardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?