Stephens v. Jacobson
| David Terrance Stephens and David Terrence Stephens |
| Amanda Regina Jacobson |
| 6:2019cv01052 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Thomas B Smith |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:19-CV-1052-ORL-37-EJK. Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith no longer assigned to the case. (LMM) |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT that this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (BIA) |
Filing 7
ORDER dismissing case. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 7/23/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of service re #3 Notice of designation of track by David Terrence Stephens. (BIA) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by David Terrence Stephens. (BIA) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Inquiry/Request for Case Number by David Terrence Stephens. (AC) Modified on 6/13/2019 (LMM). (Copy of docket sheet mailed to Plaintiff) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1 (ctp) (JLC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Request for Case Number re #1 Complaint by David Terrance Stephens (BIA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amanda Regina Jacobson filed by David Terrance Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BIA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.