Barnes et al v. Federal Communication Commission et al
Plaintiff: Ena Barnes and Staci-Jo Barnes
Defendant: National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Communication Commission
Case Number: 6:2019cv01428
Filed: August 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy B Dalton
Referring Judge: Gregory J Kelly
2 Judge: Embry J Kidd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER directing the filing of a renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on or before Thursday, October 3, 2019 or to pay the filing fee. Responses due by 10/3/2019. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/26/2019. (JLC)
September 23, 2019 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Communication Commission, National Security Agency filed by Staci-Jo Barnes, Ena Barnes. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Staci-Jo Barnes, Ena Barnes.(BIA)
September 10, 2019 Set/reset deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 9/24/2019 (BIA)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Staci-Jo Barnes. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/10/2019. (JLC)
September 9, 2019 Filing 12 Remark: Doc. #10 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/9/19. (EJV)
September 6, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Refute/OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendations by Ena Barnes and Staci-Jo Barnes. (RDO)
September 6, 2019 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Ena Barnes and Staci-Jo Barnes. (RDO)
August 20, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Ena Barnes, Staci-Jo Barnes. Related case(s): yes (BIA)
August 20, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court: 1. DENY the Motion (Doc. No. 2); 2. DISMISS the Complaint with prejudice; and 3. Direct the Clerk to close the case. A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. Failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 8/20/2019. (MB)
August 19, 2019 Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:19-cv-1428-Orl-37GJK. Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd no longer assigned to the case. Motion #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. (MAA)
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER reassigning this case to the Honorable Gregory Kelly for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 8/16/2019. (JLE)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRO SE ORDER. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 8/12/2019. (JLC)
August 12, 2019 Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/12/2019. (ctp)(JLC)
August 12, 2019 Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/12/2019. (ctp)(JLC)
August 2, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Staci-Jo Barnes. (BIA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd.
August 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Communication Commission, National Security Agency filed by Staci-Jo Barnes, Ena Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BIA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes et al v. Federal Communication Commission et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Security Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Communication Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ena Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Staci-Jo Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?