McKennie v. Young et al
| Rex McKennie |
| Glenn Young, Ronnie Seers, Keona Hines, Keith Buckner and Q. Williams |
| 6:2019cv01476 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER to file amended complaint within 21 days on the civil rights complaint form provided. #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff must submit a consent form indicating his understanding that he is required to pay the full filing fee in this case, even if his motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 10/10/2019. (LAK)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/10/2019. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/27/2019. (DJD) ctp
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Rex McKennie. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Trust Account)(SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rex McKennie. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B)(SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
