Otero-Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 6:2019cv01512
Filed: August 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Gregory J Kelly
Referring Judge: G Kendall Sharp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF of service as to Commissioner of Social Security on 9/9/19 by Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano. (SPM)
October 7, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano. Commissioner of Social Security/U.S. Attorney served on 9/2/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. (SPM)
August 29, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RDO)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 8/19/2019. (MB)
August 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano. Related case(s): YES (Keeter, James)
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (SPM)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 8/15/2019. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
August 15, 2019 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:19-cv-1512-Orl-18GJK. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 Verified MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. (SJB)
August 14, 2019 Filing 2 Verified MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Keeter, James)
August 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keeter, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otero-Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Madeline Enid Otero-Feliciano
Represented By: James Wilson Keeter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?