Breigh v. Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc.
Jaes D. Breigh |
Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc. |
6:2019cv01524 |
August 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Daniel C Irick |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. On or before 10/15/2019, Defendant shall respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 9/30/2019. (Irick, Daniel) |
Filing 12 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by defendant by 10/15/2019. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/30/2019. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to October 15, 2019, to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc.. (Ramos, Michele) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. Modified on 9/30/2019 (SPM). |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Jaes D. Breigh. (Guadagnolo, Richard) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Order to comply with Local rule per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jaes D. Breigh. Related case(s): no (Guadagnolo, Richard) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc. (SPM) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Jaes D. Breigh. (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/27/2019. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/10/2019. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/27/2019. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER directing compliance with Local Rule 1.04(d) by 9/10/19. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/27/2019. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Jaes D. Breigh. (Storch, Noah) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:19-cv-1524-Orl-41DCI. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15813336) filed by Jaes Breigh. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storch, Noah) Modified on 8/16/2019 (SPM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Breigh v. Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Acariahealth Pharmacy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michele Ann Ramos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jaes D. Breigh | |
Represented By: | Noah E. Storch |
Represented By: | Richard D. Guadagnolo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.