Bussie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
Anthony Bussie |
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
6:2019cv01525 |
August 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Daniel C Irick |
G Kendall Sharp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Anthony Bussie. Related case(s): yes (DMA) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT that the Plaintiff, ANTHONY BUSSIE, take nothing on his claims against the Defendants, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, and the action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (DMA) |
Filing 3 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 8/26/2019. (SC) |
Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 8/19/2019. (copy mailed)(AKC) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State - filed by Anthony Bussie. (Filing fee not paid. Motion for IFP not filed). (DMA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.