Henry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
David Paul Henry |
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
6:2019cv01692 |
August 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Paul G Byron |
Embry J Kidd |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by David Paul Henry. Related case(s): yes (RDO) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for leave to file. Petitioner shall have 60 days to file an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 10/10/2019. (LAK) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 10/7/2019. (GNB) copies mailed |
Filing 3 MOTION for leave to file an Amended Habeas Corpus Petition by David Paul Henry. (RDO) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
Filing 2 ORDER to file amended petition for writ of habeas corpus within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 9/5/2019. (LAK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State filed by David Paul Henry. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(RDO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.