Wilson v. McKinney et al
Deponty Demon Wilson |
Margie McKinney and Lorenzo Toney |
6:2019cv01933 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Daniel C Irick |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Margie McKinney Terminating Lorenzo Toney filed by Deponty Demon Wilson. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Deponty Demon Wilson.(DMA) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Deponty Demon Wilson. Related case(s): no. (MAA) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing plaintiff to file amended complaint within 21 days. The clerk is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of the standard civil rights complaint form along with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 10/29/2019. (copies mailed)(MAA) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 11/8/2019. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/25/2019. (DJD) ctp |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Deponty Demon Wilson. (ARJ) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Margie McKinney, Lorenzo Toney filed by Deponty Demon Wilson.(ARJ) Modified on 10/22/2019 (ARJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.