Pond v. Red Lambda, Inc. et al
Kyle Pond |
Red Lambda, Inc. and Bahram Yusefzadeh |
6:2019cv01975 |
October 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Roy B Dalton |
Embry J Kidd |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Joint MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to Approve FLSA Settlement Agreement by Red Lambda, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Thornton, James) |
Filing 16 Defendant Red Lambda, Inc.'s ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Red Lambda, Inc..(Thornton, James) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Red Lambda, Inc.. Related case(s): NO (Thornton, James) |
Filing 14 Remark: Doc. #13 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/29/19. (EBU) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Kyle Pond. (Hollifield, Travis) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Kyle Pond. Related case(s): no (Hollifield, Travis) |
Filing 11 Remark: Doc. #10 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/28/19. (EBU) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Red Lambda, Inc.. (Thornton, James) |
Filing 9 ORDER to strike re: #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Red Lambda, Inc. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/23/2019. (ctp)(JLC) |
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant Red Lambda, Inc. must answer or respond on or before November 1, 2019. The parties are advised that no further extensions of time will be granted based solely on ongoing settlement negotiations. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/23/2019. (MT) |
Set/reset deadlines: Defendant Red Lambda, Inc. must answer or respond to Complaint on or before November 1, 2019. (DMA) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal and Complaint by Red Lambda, Inc.. (Thornton, James) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. |
Filing 6 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/22/2019. (ctp)(JLC) |
Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 11/4/2019. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/21/2019. (ctp)(JLC) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 11/4/2019. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/21/2019. (Ctp)(JLC) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:19-cv-1975-Orl-37EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 2 **STRICKEN PER #9 ORDER** 7.1 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Red Lambda, Inc. (Thornton, James) Modified on 10/18/2019 (SPM). Modified on 10/23/2019 (DMA). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court, case number 2019-CA-001675 filed in State Court on May 25, 2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16036050 filed by Red Lambda, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thornton, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.