Armstrong Aluminum Inc. v. Benada Aluminum Products, LLC et al
| Armstrong Aluminum Inc. |
| Benada Aluminum Products, LLC and Eagle Metal Distributors, Inc. |
| 6:2019cv02001 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Embry J Kidd |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Armstrong Aluminum Inc.. (Watson, Coleman) |
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:19-cv-2001-Orl-22EJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Armstrong Aluminum Inc.. Related case(s): NO (Watson, Coleman) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Emerson Moats on behalf of Armstrong Aluminum Inc. (Moats, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Leia Villasenor Leitner on behalf of Armstrong Aluminum Inc. (Leitner, Leia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Benada Aluminum Products, LLC, Eagle Metal Distributors, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16050410) filed by Armstrong Aluminum Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Watson, Coleman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
