Bombka v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Tracy Michelle Bombka |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2020cv00234 |
| February 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Embry J Kidd |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 2/12/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (SPM)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:20-cv-234-Orl-18EJK. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Tracy Michelle Bombka. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Fugate, Shea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Tracy Michelle Bombka. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fugate, Shea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
