Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution
| Vinodh Raghubir |
| Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution |
| 6:2020cv00654 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #12 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Petitioner is not entitled to appeal as a pauper and shall pay the appellate filing fee as required. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 5/29/2020. (SC)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Vinodh Raghubir. (Originally received in USCA on 05/22/2020) (ALL) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #10 Notice of Appeal. (SPM) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Vinodh Raghubir. Filing fee not paid. (No orders were indicated in the appeal notice) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LDJ) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION re #8 Order on Motion to VacateOrder on Motion for Reconsideration / Clarification by Vinodh Raghubir. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LDJ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Vacate ; denying #5 Motion for Rehearing En Banc. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 5/5/2020. (SC)
|
| Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal. (SPM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order dismissing case by Vinodh Raghubir. Filing fee not paid. (SPM) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration by Vinodh Raghubir. (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Vacate by Vinodh Raghubir. (SPM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 4/24/2020. (SC)
|
|
Filing 2
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 4/16/2020. (copy mailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal filed by Vinodh Raghubir. (No filing fee and no IFP motion filed.) (Attachments: #1 Various Documents)(SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Raghubir v. Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Vinodh Raghubir | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Taylor Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
