Steagall v. WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc.
| Thomas Steagall |
| WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc. |
| 6:2020cv00822 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Leslie R Hoffman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER of service returned executed on 06/04/2020 by Thomas Steagall as to WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc.. (Duffie, Allison) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Thomas Steagall. (Duffie, Allison) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #5 Related Case Order by Thomas Steagall. Related case(s): no (Duffie, Allison) Modified on 5/27/2020 (RDO). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc.. (RDO) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Thomas Steagall re #1 Complaint corrected Summons (Duffie, Allison) |
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER on Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman on 1/6/2020.(MDH)
|
|
Filing 6
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. The Certificate of Interested Persons shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/13/2020. (GNB) copies e-mailed
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/13/2020. (GNB) copies e-mailed
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc. with Jury Demand. filed by Thomas Steagall. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Thomas Steagall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Duffie, Allison) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Order for Details. On or before Wednesday, May 20, 2020, Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 5/13/2020. (JBS)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:20-cv-822-Orl-40LRH. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16802023) filed by Thomas Steagall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Duffie, Allison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steagall v. WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WeDo Technologies Americas, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Steagall | |
| Represented By: | Allison Beth Duffie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
