Guinigundo v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
| Jaimely Guinigundo |
| SunTrust Banks, Inc., ARCHR5MCFL001, LLC d/b/a SunTrust and ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC doing business as Suntrust |
| ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC |
| 6:2020cv00874 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Leslie R Hoffman |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by SunTrust Banks, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Suntrust Bank Inc. for SunTrust Banks, Inc... (Liebowitz, Daniel) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Pendency of Related Cases - None. re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) filed by SunTrust Banks, Inc.. (Liebowitz, Daniel) Modified on 7/7/2020 document is not a response to show cause order but the notice of pendency of related cases (AKC). Modified on 7/7/2020 (DMA). |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #15 Order to show cause filed by SunTrust Banks, Inc.. (Liebowitz, Daniel) |
| Filing 17 SunTrust Bank, Inc., Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #14 Crossclaim by SunTrust Banks, Inc.. Related document: #14 Answer to ComplaintCrossclaim filed by ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC.(Liebowitz, Daniel) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC. Related case(s): No (Chindamo, Joey) |
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Defendant Suntrust Banks, Inc. shall SHOW CAUSE and file a response within 15 days from the date of this Order for failure to comply with the Court's Orders of May 22, 2020. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/22/2020. (SC)
|
| Filing 14 ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM against SunTrust Banks, Inc. by ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC.(Chindamo, Joey) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE to counsel Joey M. Chindamo of Local Rule 2.01, General Admission to Practice, which states - No person shall be permitted to appear or be heard as counsel for another in any proceeding in this Court unless first admitted to practice in the Court pursuant to this rule (or heretofore admitted under prior rules of the Court). Apply for membership to the bar of this Court at www.flmd.uscourts.gov (Signed by Deputy Clerk).(copy to counsel) (SPM) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC shall respond to the Complaint on or before June 12, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman on 5/28/2020. (MDH)
|
| Set deadlines: for ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC. Answer due by 6/12/2020. (SPM) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC. (Brown, Thomas)(Joey M. Chindamo) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. Modified on 5/28/2020 (SPM). |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC identifying Corporate Parent SunTrust Bank for ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC, SunTrust Banks, Inc. (Brown, Thomas)(Joey M. Chindamo) Modified on 5/28/2020 (SPM). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joey M. Chindamo on behalf of ARC HR5MCFL001, LLC (Brown, Thomas) Modified on 5/28/2020 (SPM).**Filed on behalf of Attorney Joey M. Chindamo. See Local Rule 2.01 entered at docket entry 13.** |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Jaimely Guinigundo. (Lynd, Craig) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) Related case(s): yes by Jaimely Guinigundo. (Lynd, Craig) Modified on 5/27/2020 (SPM). |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER on Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman on 1/6/2020.(MDH)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida, case number 2020-CA-4151 filed in State Court on April 20, 2020. filed by SunTrust Banks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Return of Service, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #5 Exhibit E - Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit Comp. F - State Court Other Documents)(Dolney, Ana) |
|
Filing 4
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER for Plaintiff and Defendant SunTrust Bank, Inc. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 5/22/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 5/22/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:20-cv-874-Orl-18LRH. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COUNSEL CALLED AND TOLD TO REFILE THIS ENTRY USING THE CORRECT NOTICE OF REMOVAL EVENT - NOTICE by SunTrust Banks, Inc. of Removal of action from State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Return of Service, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Answer and Aff. Defenses, #5 Exhibit E - Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit Comp. F - Remaining Documents)(Dolney, Ana) Modified text on 5/22/2020 (MAA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
