Lopez v. Trump et al
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr. |
Leticia Marques, Donald Trump, Thomas J. Alevizos, Tom Young, Elizabeth C. Hurley and Heather Higbee |
6:2020cv00969 |
June 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Leslie R Hoffman |
G Kendall Sharp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT that the Plaintiff, RODOLFO ANTONIO LOPEZ, JR., take nothing on his claims against the Defendants, DONALD TRUMP, et al., and the action be DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (DMA) |
Filing 4 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate any pending motions, enter Judgment, and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/24/2020. (SC) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/5/2020. (copy mailed)(AKC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of filing Entry of Appearance by Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr. (SPM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr. (No filing fee and no IFP motion filed.) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SPM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.