Peterson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
Henry Peterson |
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
6:2020cv01052 |
June 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Daniel C Irick |
G Kendall Sharp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FEES paid by Henry Peterson (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number ORL091776) (ARJ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Henry Peterson. Related case(s): Y (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(DMA) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Respondents against Petitioner (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SPM) |
Filing 3 ORDER dismissing case re #1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus.Clerk to enter judgment and close the case. Petitioner is denied certificate of appealability. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/22/2020. (copy mailed to petitioner)(AKC) |
Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 6/16/2020. (copy mailed)(AKC) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State - filed by Henry Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Petition Part 2, #2 Mailing Envelope) (Filing fee not paid. IFP Motion not filed).(DMA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.