Holmes v. Adventist Health System Sunbelt, Inc
Tonya Holmes |
Adventist Health System Sunbelt Inc dba Adventhealth Orlando and Adventist Health System Sunbelt, Inc doing business as AdventHealth Orlando |
6:2020cv01153 |
June 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Embry J Kidd |
Gregory A Presnell |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:20-cv-1153-Orl-31EJK. (SJB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Adventist Health System Sunbelt Inc dba Adventhealth Orlando. Related case(s): yes (Johnson, Nancy) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Adventist Health System Sunbelt Inc dba Adventhealth Orlando. (Johnson, Nancy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial Circuit Orange County FL, case number 2020-CA-5633-O filed in State Court on 6/1/2020. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16995754 filed by Adventist Health System Sunbelt Inc dba Adventhealth Orlando. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court COMPLAINT, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Nancy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.