Newman v. Geico General Insurance Company et al
Jonathan Newman |
Geico General Insurance Company and Christian Colon |
6:2020cv01523 |
August 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Embry J Kidd |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Shelby, Keegan) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying #13 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/7/2020. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 13 First MOTION to Remand to State Court and Supporting Memorandum of Law by Jonathan Newman. (Toth, Adrienn) Modified text on 9/14/2020 (TNP). |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Christian Colon identifying Other Affiliate Christian Colon for Christian Colon.. (Justice, Petra) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re: #3 Related Case Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Christian Colon. Related case(s): Yes (Justice, Petra) Modified on 9/8/2020 (MAA). |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Jonathan Newman. (Toth, Adrienn) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jonathan Newman. Related case(s): yes (Toth, Adrienn) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Geico General Insurance Company. (Shelby, Keegan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Geico General Insurance Company. Related case(s): yes (Shelby, Keegan) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd on 1/3/2020. (PML) ctp |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/24/2020. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/8/2020. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/24/2020. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/8/2020. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/24/2020. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:20-cv-1523-ORL-41EJK. (LRB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Circuit Court, case number 2020-CA-006024-O filed in State Court on 06/09/2020. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-17212048 filed by Geico General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit Accident Report, #7 Exhibit Voter Information - Plaintiff, #8 Exhibit Medical Records, #9 Exhibit LinkedIn, #10 Exhibit Facebook, #11 Exhibit Voter Information - Co-Defendant, #12 Exhibit Corporate Report, #13 Exhibit Demand, #14 Exhibit Medical Records & Bills, #15 Exhibit Answers to Interrogatories, #16 Exhibit N-Clerk re N-Removal)(Shelby, Keegan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.