Jaramillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2020cv01722 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #12 DEFENDANT'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS. 1. The case is STAYED for a period of sixty days from the date of this Order; 2. The Commissioner is DIRECTED to file a status report thirty days after the date of this Order, addressing whether he remains unable to create the certified transcript for this case; 3. In the event the Commissioner creates the certified transcript for this case before the stay ends, the Commissioner is DIRECTED to immediately file the certified transcript with the Court; and 4. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 11/19/2020. (MB)
|
|
Case Stayed. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 Opposed MOTION for Stay of Proceedings filed by Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo. (Culbertson, Richard)
|
|
Filing 12
Opposed MOTION for Stay of Proceedings by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Rudy, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. Modified on 11/17/2020 (SPM).
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF of service by Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo as to the Office of Regional Chief Counsel on 9/25/2020(Culbertson, Richard) Modified on 10/29/2020 (SPM).
|
|
Filing 10
PROOF of service by Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo as to the Attorney General on 9/28/2020 (Culbertson, Richard) Modified on 10/29/2020 (SPM).
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS returned executed by Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/23/2020, answer due 11/23/2020. (Culbertson, Richard)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #6 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo. Related case(s): No (Culbertson, Richard)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/22/2020. (MEH) ctp
|
|
Filing 6
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/6/2020. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/22/2020. (MEH) ctp
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 3
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:20-cv-1722-Orl-41GJK. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo (Jacobs, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17332187) filed by Ruben Eleazar Jaramillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Culbertson, Richard)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
