Johannes v. Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jonathan Johannes
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2020cv01772
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Paul G Byron
Referring Judge: Gregory J Kelly
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Kelsey Israel-Trummel, appearing on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Filing fee $150 receipt number ORL094363.) Related document: #17 MOTION to appear pro hac vice and Written Designation and Consent to Act. (KNC)
November 4, 2020 ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Cindi L. Ritchey, appearing on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Filing fee $150 receipt number ORL094364.) Related document: #16 MOTION to appear pro hac vice and Written Designation and Consent to Act. (KNC)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #16 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF CINDI L. RITCHEY, WRITTEN DESIGNATION AND CONSENT TO ACT; granting #17 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF KELSEY ISRAEL-TRUMMEL, WRITTEN DESIGNATION AND CONSENT TO ACT, provided counsel shall register for and use the electronic filing system as adopted by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 10/30/2020. (MB)
October 28, 2020 Filing 17 MOTION to appear pro hac vice and Written Designation and Consent to Act by Christopher Martin Lomax on behalf of Walmart, Inc.. Local Counsel: Christopher M. Lomax. Non-Resident Counsel: Kelsey Israel-Trummel. (Lomax, Christopher) Modified on 10/29/2020 (RDO).
October 28, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION to appear pro hac vice and Written Designation and Consent to Act by Christopher Martin Lomax on behalf of Walmart, Inc.. Local Counsel: Christopher M. Lomax. Non-Resident Counsel: Cindi L. Ritchey. (Lomax, Christopher) Modified on 10/29/2020 (RDO).
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. By 11/18/2020, the parties shall serve copies upon each other as stated in the order; By 1/6/2021 the parties are to meet and confer; Answer to court interrogatories due by 12/9/2020; Settlement Report due by 1/26/2021. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 10/28/2020. (MB)
October 27, 2020 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Walmart, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Walmart Inc. for Walmart, Inc... (Lomax, Christopher)
October 27, 2020 Filing 13 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Walmart, Inc..(Lomax, Christopher) Modified on 10/28/2020 (RDO).
October 13, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jonathan Johannes. Related case(s): no (Barszcz, David)
October 13, 2020 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Jonathan Johannes. (Barszcz, David)
October 12, 2020 Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on October 6, 2020 by Jonathan Johannes as to Walmart, Inc.. (Barszcz, David)
October 1, 2020 Filing 9 SUMMONS reissued as to Walmart, Inc.. (RDO)
September 30, 2020 Filing 8 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Jonathan Johannes. (Lytle, Mary)
September 29, 2020 Filing 7 (WRONG DEFENDANT NAMED. REISSUED AT #9) SUMMONS issued as to Walmart, Inc.. (RDO) Modified on 10/1/2020 (RDO).
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/29/2020. (GNB) copies e-mailed
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. The Certificate of Interested Persons shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/29/2020. (GNB) copies e-mailed
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 9/29/2020. (GNB) copies e-mailed
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:20-cv-1772-Orl-40GJK. (SJB)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of consent to join by All Plaintiffs - Jonathan Johannes. (Barszcz, David)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17361483) filed by Jonathan Johannes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Barszcz, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johannes v. Walmart, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Represented By: Cindi L. Ritchey
Represented By: Christopher Martin Lomax
Represented By: Kelsey Israel-Trummel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Johannes
Represented By: David Victor Barszcz
Represented By: Mary E. Lytle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?