Bolton v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Emily E. Bolton |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2020cv01900 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Leslie R Hoffman |
| G Kendall Sharp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
PROOF of service as to Attorney General on 11/16/2020 by Emily E. Bolton (TNP)
|
|
Filing 14
PROOF of service as to Office of Regional Chief Counsel on 11/19/2020 by Emily E. Bolton (TNP)
|
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS returned executed by Emily E. Bolton. Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/3/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (TNP)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 11
US Marshal 285 form for summons and complaint. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Office of General Counsel, #2 Supplement Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 10
PROPOSED summons to be issued by Emily E. Bolton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Office of General Counsel, #2 Proposed Summons Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Counsel for Plaintiff shall obtain the appropriate summonses and Marshal 285 forms from the Court's website, and complete and return them to the Clerk of Court on or before November 12, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman on 10/29/2020. (MKH)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Emily E. Bolton. (Boyd, Bradley) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman.
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #6 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Emily E. Bolton. Related case(s): no (Boyd, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 6
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 10/16/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On or before October 30, 2020, Plaintiff may renew her request to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs (Long Form). Alternatively, on or before October 30, 2020, Plaintiff must pay the required filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman on 10/16/2020. (MKH)
|
|
Set deadlines: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs (Long Form) or Filing Fee payment due by 10/30/2020. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 3
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:20-cv-1900-Orl-18LRH. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Emily E Bolton. (Boyd, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Emily E Bolton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyd, Bradley)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
