Rabello v. Chief of Immigrant Investor Program et al
| Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello |
| Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William Barr, Division Chief Lori Mackenzie, Chief Sarah Kendall, Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Division Chief of Immigrant Investor Program, Chief of Immigrant Investor Program, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General of the United States |
| 6:2020cv01994 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 1/6/2021. (Conway, Anne)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS returned executed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello as to USAtty on 11/2/2020. (Hurd, Rusten) Modified on 11/9/2020 (MAA). |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. Attorney General of the United States served on 11/5/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security served on 11/4/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 11/4/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. Division Chief of Immigrant Investor Program served on 11/4/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. Chief of Immigrant Investor Program served on 11/4/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case/interested persons/ECF-1 by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. (Hurd, Rusten) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #3 Related Case Order by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. Related case(s): no (Hurd, Rusten) Modified on 10/30/2020 (RDO). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RDO) |
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER, NOTICE OF DESIGNATION under Local Rule 3.05-Track 1, INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER and ORDER Requiring Electronic Filing. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 11/12/2020. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 11/12/2020. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 10/28/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:20-cv-1994-Orl-22DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Mandamus Relief against all Defendant. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17476735) filed by Marcelo Albuquerque Rabello. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summon (Kendall), #3 Proposed Summons Summon (Mackenzie), #4 Proposed Summons Summon (Cuccinnelli), #5 Proposed Summons Summon (Wolf), #6 Proposed Summons Summon (Barr), #7 Proposed Summons Summon (Chapa Lopez))(Hurd, Rusten) Modified on 10/28/2020 (RDO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
