Leighton v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Robert Leighton |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 6:2020cv02142 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Robert Leighton. Related case(s): yes (Zadel, Bartholomew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1. (BIA) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (KNC) |
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (KNC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:20-cv-2142-Orl-37DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17579936) filed by Robert Leighton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Attorney General, #4 Proposed Summons Regional Chief Counsel, #5 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney)(Zadel, Bartholomew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
