Radiation Medicine Physicians, P.A. v. Tomotherapy Incorporated et al
| Radiation Medicine Physicians, P.A. |
| Tomotherapy Incorporated and Accuray Incorporated |
| 6:2020cv02177 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Robisch, Kyle) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in opposition re #8 Motion to Dismiss, #12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Radiation Medicine Physicians, P.A.. (Banks, Brandon) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss re #1 Complaint by Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A", #2 Exhibit "D", #3 Exhibit "E")(Robisch, Kyle) Modified text on 12/14/2020 (MEJ). |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Related case/interested persons/ECF-2 by Radiation Medicine Physicians, P.A.. (Banks, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated. (Robisch, Kyle) Modified text on 12/14/2020 (MEJ). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related Cases Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated. Related case(s): NO (Robisch, Kyle) Modified text on 12/14/2020 (MEJ). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss re #1 Complaint by Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A", #2 Exhibit "D", #3 Exhibit "E")(Robisch, Kyle) Modified text on 12/14/2020 (MEJ). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case/interested persons/ECF-2 per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Radiation Medicine Physicians, P.A.. Related case(s): No (Banks, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Allen Andreu on behalf of Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated (Andreu, Timothy) |
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER, NOTICE OF DESIGNATION under Local Rule 3.05-Track 2, INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER and ORDER Requiring Electronic Filing for both Plaintiff and Defendants. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 12/16/2020. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 12/16/2020. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 12/2/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. On or before 12/11/2020, Defendants shall respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 12/2/2020. (Irick, Daniel)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal and Complaint or otherwise respond by Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated. (Robisch, Kyle) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Anne C. Conway and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:20-cv-2177-Orl-22DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Circuit Court, case number 2020-CA-10834-O filed in State Court on 10/29/20. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-17600913 filed by Accuray Incorporated, Tomotherapy Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Robisch, Kyle) Modified on 12/1/2020 (MEJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
