Fekany v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
Teresa Fekany |
Amazon.Com, Inc. |
6:2020cv02330 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Gregory J Kelly |
Carlos E Mendoza |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER dismissing case with prejudice subject to the right of any party, within sixty days from the date of this Order, upon good cause, to move the Court to re-open the case in accordance with Local Rule 3.09(b). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 2/12/2021. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 17 NOTICE of settlement by Teresa Fekany (Levy, Chad) |
Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. On or before February 16, 2021, Plaintiff may file its Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 2/2/2021. (AMD) |
Set deadlines as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Platiniff's Complaint . Responses due by 2/16/2021 (SPM) |
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to February 16, 2021, to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Platiniff's Complaint with prejudice by Teresa Fekany. (Levy, Chad) Modified on 2/1/2021 (SPM). |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Platiniff's Complaint with prejudice by Amazon.Com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - 2019-07-18 - Petition for Workers' Compensation Benefits.pdf, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - 2019-12-16 - Petition for Workers' Compensation Benefits, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - 2020-02-06 - Petition for Workers' Compensation Benefits)(Zelek, Mark) |
Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Zelek, Mark) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #5 Related case order by Amazon.Com, Inc. Related case(s): yes (Zelek, Mark) Modified on 1/19/2021 (SPM). |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Amazon.Com, Inc.. (Zelek, Mark) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Interested persons order by Teresa Fekany. (Levy, Chad) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #5 Related case order by Teresa Fekany. Related case(s): Yes (Levy, Chad) Modified on 1/19/2021 (SPM). |
Filing 8 ORDER Judge Kelly's Standing Discovery Order Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 1/11/2021. (MB) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/8/2021. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 6 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 1/22/2021. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/8/2021. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/22/2021. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/8/2021. (MEH) ctp |
Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND FILE ITS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. The response to the complaint and the corporate disclosure statement are due January 19, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 12/28/2020. (MB) |
Set deadlines: for Amazon.Com, Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement and Answer due by 1/19/2021. (SPM) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to January 19, 2021, to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal , Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amazon.Com, Inc. (Zelek, Mark) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. Modified on 12/28/2020 (SPM). |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:20-cv-2330-Orl-41GJK. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, case number 2020-CA-011619 filed in State Court on 11/20/2020. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-17689545 filed by Amazon.Com, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Other State Court Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Tab A, #6 Exhibit Tab B, #7 Exhibit Tab C)(Zelek, Mark) Modified on 12/22/2020 (SPM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fekany v. Amazon.Com, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Teresa Fekany | |
Represented By: | David Mitchell Cozad |
Represented By: | Chad E. Levy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amazon.Com, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Mark E. Zelek |
Represented By: | Joseph Magrisso |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.