Iglesias De Guerra v. Dean
| Ana Karina Iglesias De Guerra |
| Director Kimberly D. Dean and Kimberly D. Dean |
| 6:2021cv00120 |
| January 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Paul G Byron |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Proof of Service by Ana Karina Iglesias De Guerra. (Bander, Stephen) Modified on 1/22/2021 (RDO). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Kimberly D. Dean. (RDO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Ana Karina Iglesias De Guerra. Related case(s): no (Bander, Stephen) |
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. The Notice of Pendency of Other Actions shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/20/2021. (GNB) copies e-mailed
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Paul G. Byron and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:21-cv-0120-Orl-40DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Petition for Review of Agency Decision against Kimberly D. Dean (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-17777649) filed by Ana Karina Iglesias De Guerra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Bander, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
