Rubens v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee
| Giovanni Rubens |
| L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee |
| 6:2021cv00407 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Gregory A Presnell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1161 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee. Related case(s): No (Zehnder, Thomas) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #14 Interested persons order by L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee. (Zehnder, Thomas) |
Filing 15
ORDER waiving the requirement to use the Uniform Case Management Report form, and directing the parties to this Court's specialized case management report for class action cases. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 4/19/2021. (LAM)
|
|
Filing 14
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER to Defendant. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 5/3/2021. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 4/19/2021. (LAM)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Dustin Michael Mauser-Claassen on behalf of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee (Mauser-Claassen, Dustin) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER of service returned executed on 04/09/2021 by L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee as to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee. (Zehnder, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas A. Zehnder on behalf of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee (Zehnder, Thomas) |
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER. Upon consideration of the #9 Response to order to show cause filed by counsel for Giovanni Rubens, the #6 Order to show cause is hereby DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 3/30/2021. (LAM)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #6 Order to show cause filed by Giovanni Rubens. (Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Order by Giovanni Rubens. (Hill, Brandon) Modified text on 3/29/2021 (MEJ). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Giovanni Rubens. Related case(s): No (Hill, Brandon) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, which may include dismissal of thiscase, for failure to respond to the Court's order. Show Cause Response due by 4/9/2021. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 3/26/2021. (LAM)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 2/1/2021. (RN)
|
|
Filing 4
INITITAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by District Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 3/4/2021. (DS) Modified on 3/4/2021 (DS).
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee. (MEJ) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Gregory A. Presnell and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:21-cv-0407-GAP-DCI. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (CLASS ACTION) against L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-17951178) filed by Giovanni Rubens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hill, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
