Mangal v. Segway Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ajay Mangal
Defendant: Ninebot (Beijing) Tech. Co., Ltd. and Segway Inc.
Case Number: 6:2021cv00417
Filed: March 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: John Antoon
Referring Judge: Leslie R Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Interested persons order by Segway Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Segway Inc., Corporate Parent Ninebot (Beijing) Tech. Co., Ltd. for Segway Inc. (Loveland, Samantha)
April 26, 2021 Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Segway Inc..(Loveland, Samantha)
April 23, 2021 Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 3/18/21 by Ajay Mangal as to Segway Inc.. (Knopf, Andrew)
March 17, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Segway Inc. (ARJ)
March 16, 2021 Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Ajay Mangal. (Knopf, Andrew)
March 4, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Interested persons order by Ajay Mangal. (Knopf, Andrew)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL CASE ORDER - Notice of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Counsel have 14 days from the date of this order to file their disclosure statement (if not already filed) and to notify the court of a related action (not required if there are no related actions). Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 3/4/2021. (counsel mailed/emailed)(AKC)
March 4, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John Antoon II and Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman. New case number: 6:21-cv-0417-JA-LRH. (SJB)
March 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-17956939) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Knopf, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mangal v. Segway Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ninebot (Beijing) Tech. Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Segway Inc.
Represented By: Samantha S Loveland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ajay Mangal
Represented By: Andrew F. Knopf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?