Keirsted v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
| Wendy Keirsted |
| The Proctor & Gamble Company |
| 6:2021cv00778 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Gregory J Kelly |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the Southern District of New York as case 7:21-cv-05648, filed on 06/30/2021. (ALL) |
| Filing 23 TRANSFER to the Southern District of New York. (ALL) |
Filing 22
ORDER granting #21 Motion to Change Venue / Transfer Case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, for consideration with Nieves v. Proctor & Gamble Co, No. 7:21-cv-00186. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/28/2021. (BIA)
|
| Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION to Transfer Venue and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by The Proctor & Gamble Company. (Diamond, Spencer) Modified on 6/28/2021 (matched text to pleading) (KNC). |
| Reset deadlines: for The Proctor & Gamble Company. Response to Complaint due on or before 8/12/2021. (KNC) |
|
Filing 20
ENDORSED ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply to Plaintiff's complaint. Response due by 8/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 6/15/2021. (Smith, Thomas)
|
| Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #17 Order on Motion for Extension of time to Answer by Wendy Keirsted. (Wright, William) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. Modified on 6/15/2021 (KNC). |
| Set/reset deadlines/hearings: for The Proctor & Gamble Company. Answer due by 7/15/2021. (RDO) |
| Filing 18 Remark: Doc. #15 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/11/21. (EBU) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Proctor & Gamble Company answer or response due 7/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 6/11/2021. (Smith, Thomas)
|
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading re #12 Amended Complaint by The Proctor & Gamble Company. (Diamond, Spencer) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. Modified on 6/11/2021 (KNC). |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 Order pdf by The Proctor & Gamble Company. (Diamond, Spencer) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Miles Diamond on behalf of The Proctor & Gamble Company (Diamond, Spencer) |
| Filing 13 RETURN of service executed on 5/25/2021 by Wendy Keirsted as to The Proctor & Gamble Company. (Wright, William) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Proctor & Gamble Company with Jury Demand. filed by Wendy Keirsted.(Wright, William) |
| Filing 11 Remark: Doc. #10 has been reviewed. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 5/10/21. (EJV) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Wendy Keirsted. (Wright, William) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Wendy Keirsted. Related case(s): No (Wright, William) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER re Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 5/5/2021. (BIA) (CTP)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Patrick Faherty on behalf of Wendy Keirsted (Faherty, Daniel) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Wednesday, May 19, 2021, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order. Failure to timely file will result in closure of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 5/5/2021. (BIA) (CTP)
|
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by Wendy Keirsted. (Wright, William) Modified on 5/5/2021 (KNC). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to The Proctor & Gamble Company. (KNC) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Judge Kelly's Standing Discovery Order Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 5/5/2021. (MB)
|
| Set deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 5/19/2021 (KNC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly. New case number: 6:21-cv-0778-RBD-GJK. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BFLMDC-18210652) filed by Wendy Keirsted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Wright, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keirsted v. The Proctor & Gamble Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Proctor & Gamble Company | |
| Represented By: | Spencer Miles Diamond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wendy Keirsted | |
| Represented By: | William Charles Wright |
| Represented By: | Daniel Patrick Faherty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
